Preface | ||
Introduction | ||
Part I | KNOWLEDGE | |
Ch. 1 | SCEPTICISM | |
1.1 | Some Distinctions | |
1.2 | Three Sceptical Arguments | |
1.3 | A Short Way with the Sceptic | |
1.4 | Another Reply | |
1.5 | A Better Response | |
Ch. 2 | KNOWLEDGE | |
2.1 | The Traditional Account | |
2.2 | Gettier Counter-Examples | |
2.3 | Responses to Gettier | |
2.4 | Concluding Remarks | |
Ch. 3 | THE CONDITIONAL THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE | |
3.1 | The Theory | |
3.2 | Some Comments | |
3.3 | The Principle of Closure and the First Sceptical Argument | |
3.4 | Has Nozick Refuted the Sceptic? | |
3.5 | Internalism and Externalism | |
Part II | JUSTIFICATION | |
Ch. 4 | FOUNDATIONALISM | |
4.1 | Classical Foundationalism | |
4.2 | Problems for the Classical Foundationalist | |
4.3 | Foundationalism without Infallibility | |
Ch. 5 | FOUNDATIONALISM AND OTHER MINDS | |
5.1 | Basic Beliefs and One's Own Sensory States | |
5.2 | The Problem of Other Minds | |
5.3 | The Argument from Analogy | |
5.4 | Can You Understand Propositions about Minds Other than your Own? | |
5.5 | The Private Language Argument: Rule-following | |
5.6 | Another Interpretation | |
5.7 | Common Conclusions | |
5.8 | Prospects for Foundationalism | |
Ch. 6 | EMPIRICIST THEORIES OF MEANING | |
6.1 | The Relevance of Theories of Meaning to Epistemology | |
6.2 | Logical Empiricism and the Evidence of One's Senses | |
6.3 | Three Verificationist Theories | |
Ch. 7 | HOLISM AND INDETERMINACY | |
7.1 | The Indeterminacy of Translation | |
7.2 | Quine as a Foundationalist | |
7.3 | Atomism and Holism | |
7.4 | The Merits of a More Complete Holism | |
7.5 | Verificationism, Anti-realism and Foundationalism | |
Ch. 8 | COHERENCE THEORIES | |
8.1 | What is Coherence? | |
8.2 | The Coherence Theory of Truth | |
8.3 | The Coherence Theory of Justification | |
8.4 | The Role of Empirical Data | |
8.5 | Coherentism and Empiricism | |
Ch. 9 | COHERENCE, JUSTIFICATION AND KNOWLEDGE | |
9.1 | The Regress Argument | |
9.2 | Internalism and Externalism | |
9.3 | Degrees of Internalism | |
9.4 | Internalism and Coherentism | |
9.5 | Coherentism, Realism and Scepticism | |
Part III | FORMS OF KNOWLEDGE | |
Ch. 10 | THEORIES OF PERCEPTION | |
10.1 | Is There Room for a Philosophy of Perception? | |
10.2 | Theories of Perception | |
10.3 | Direct Realism | |
10.4 | Indirect Realism | |
10.5 | Naive and Scientific Forms of Indirect Realism | |
10.6 | Phenomenalism and Idealism | |
Ch. 11 | PERCEPTION: THE CHOICE OF A THEORY | |
11.1 | Phenomenalism and the Explanation of Experience | |
11.2 | Indirect Realism: Double Awareness and a Double Object | |
11.3 | Direct Realism and the Explanation of Perceptual Error | |
11.4 | A Causal Element | |
11.5 | Perception, Causation and Justification | |
11.6 | Direct Realism and Coherentism | |
Ch. 12 | MEMORY | |
12.1 | Theories of Memory | |
12.2 | Indirect Realism | |
12.3 | Direct Realism | |
12.4 | Phenomenalism | |
12.5 | Russell's Hypothesis | |
12.6 | Perceptual Memory and Justification | |
Ch. 13 | INDUCTION | |
13.1 | Induction, Perception and Memory | |
13.2 | Two Conceptions of the Future | |
13.3 | Hume and his Critics | |
13.4 | Goodman's New Riddle of Induction | |
13.5 | Coherentism and Induction | |
Ch. 14 | A PRIORI KNOWLEDGE | |
14.1 | Foundationalism and A Priori Knowledge | |
14.2 | Empiricism, the A Priori and the Analytic | |
14.3 | Can Synthetic Truths be Known A Priori? | |
14.4 | A Priori Knowledge and Universal Truth | |
14.5 | A Priori Knowledge and Necessary Truth | |
14.6 | Quine and the Distinction between A Priori and Empirical | |
14.7 | A Coherentist Approach | |
Ch. 15 | IS EPISTEMOLOGY POSSIBLE? | |
15.1 | Hegel | |
15.2 | Chisholm and the Problem of the Criterion | |
15.3 | Quine and the Non-existence of First Philosophy | |
15.4 | Epistemology Naturalized | |
15.5 | Conclusion | |
References | ||
Index |